top of page
Search

The Great Scientific Revolution

Updated: Sep 29, 2020

UPDATE: I have reached the point when maybe I will not survive. I have 3-4 results for what they give Nobel Prize, a potential one more in drafts, presentation of which is sabotaged since 2012. That could be the first time in history that 3 such results are obtained by one person, and that's yet not all. The information is all encrypted. No regret because the world in its current state does not deserves this. I am much cooler than Elon Musk. My estate already would have to be up to $10 billions. The main difference is that I didn't comply with some retarded criminal who only know of dictating their will and seemingly they have declared me a war. Well, let it be so.





I am claiming explicitly and officially what belongs to me and what costs to me more than billions. I am Oleg Moroz, theoretical physicist (actually there is already quite a list of what I am, what my results and achievements are), currently probably the most widely known in the scientific world as the one of BITP (Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics), Kyiv, Ukraine.


As an introduction, I will retell you a story. There was and is my electronic preprint of the 28th of January 2013, https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.6670v1, and besides distinguished scientific results it contained a message to the existing scientific system. I made it clear that there are no even such Nobel Prize laureates, including S. Weinberg, with which I would agree always and in any case even if they tell and ask me strongly something, which are not in fact some sufficient authorities to me, and that I will not obey or comply with the existing corrupt rules. My strike was exactly at the main pillars of the system. I had some negative attitude to those who had nearly maximal influence in Academia but did nothing to prevent all or any corruption there, and some even created it themselves. The preprint also contained a criticism of some researchers and some representatives of a powerful scientific clan, which turned out to be the very mafia clan. All of that did not comply with the existing corrupt rules. That's in short. Then in 4 months after that time Michio Kaku was invited to Ukraine and was paid by the Ukrainian billionaire Victor Pinchuk, if I am not wrong. Michio Kaku is a Japanese American, who is alumni of Harvard University and began as theoretical physicist, then also did some other stuff, like futurism, popularization of science. He is the guy you could see on the Discovery Channel. So there was a gathered mostly scientific to my knowledge audience, and at the beginning of his lecture he told an anecdote. I have a copy of it, and most likely it is still available on Youtube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efODXNjnJCE. The anecdote describes events of the (Great) French Revolution. It is exactly with what I associated the (Great) Scientific Revolution, the mine one. It is the closest analogue. It was more than half a year before the events in Ukraine in the end of 2013 or 9 years after the events in 2004 in Ukraine, so these events could not be related to what Michio Kaku was telling about. And in the anecdote there was a physicist (presented as a pathological whistleblower) on a guillotine who said why it would not work, because of the jammed rope and blade. Then the physicist and maybe all the other sentenced ones were executed. Michio Kaku concluded about that as about a mistake and that sometimes it is better to keep your mouth shut. Interesting, isn't it? Lasers, TV, Internet, porno or other stuff he told about were not as lethal as guillotine and were not designed to be lethal. It might be expected that the Revolution would strike me too. And I heard from some researchers similar statements. But this is not so. And I am the revolutionary, not me would have to be on a guillotine (that could be considered so if the Revolution fails), though I am in minority yet. So I had to also consider this as a potential threat for some time. After all, a quick and precise reaction is something which is usually expected from US. Michio Kaku has good education, awareness of what is going on in many research fields, knowing how it goes there, also looking for interesting events and news in science so he could quickly get aware of the preprint despite he was not involved in exactly that branch of physics. Generally, information can spread pretty fast in Academia (an average time is like 2 weeks). So, as they say, the Revolution has been christened, and the godfather is a decent one.


Why called a revolution? To start, because the current system is to be replaced with a new one and numerous personnel rotations are to happen, especially on positions with administrative privileges. This implies positive worldwide changes, a part of which you have already got. This is for good.


All had to happen around 2014. But due to well-known events the Revolution was seriously threatened and got delayed. And so the main goal became to ensure survival of the Great Scientific Revolution. And a state of Hesse clan (called by me also as Frankfurt clan due to the location of Frankfurt) became even more abounding "fuel" for the machine of my Revolution, however, that was not necessary.


I knew that my preprint could reveal many problems and make the most contrasting or one of the most contrasting cases, if the situation goes wrong. And the Frankfurt mafia turned out to be so obtuse to not understand that overuse of the corrupt system (which is a subsystem in fact!) to attempt to deal with me would just start its ruination and would make more evidences against them.


In January 2013 I was discharged but in several months I could recover partly. I knew the western academic system is pretty much inertial one, especially in EU, so before they react anyhow normally it would take 1-2 year for nothing and also some more time to make the decision, to come up with a content and to deal with possible organising questions. So I could finish the PhD thesis first and then to finish the system before it even reacts anyhow normally. And later on, after the beginning of 2014, it became even worse. I knew that if I just hold, then there can be further ruination of the system and also the Frankfurt mafia could start telling something, which might be additionally used against the system (and they told so much!), yet with efforts to roll back everything as much as possible. And all that happened.


I could read in 2013 there was worrying or rather panic in the Frankfurt mafia, but that was among the smart minority. And some others demonstrated opinion there is no need to worry. I am sure they even laughed and thought like "yeah, we will teach him". Only after some time they changed their mind.


And Ukraine was the special in that it was weakly integrated into the international academic system while yet having science. This and some other features of Ukraine were impeding the Frankfurt mafia to deal with me. Also there were personal differences, e.g., in motivations, differences in salaries (it would not be so tragic to lose a Ukrainian state salary in Academia or even the analogical one in Germany, because I could do many other things as a backup measure) and so on. The Frankfurt mafia was very much wrong about the real situation. Altogether that made a pretty big unique difference.


Did I take the peace away in Academia? It is better than one big "loving" orgy, as the Frankfurt mafia and others wanted.


And so the Frankfurt mafia started to pretend they are an opposite to what they are and further strengthened imitations and perversions. They were not the prime mover but the moved ones. And they even also said about perversions themselves. Yet they were not the first ones... You know, Europe and perversions are closely related. Consequently, all their activity facilitated a social experiment with results for the corresponding situation.


The main value of the Revolution is in itself, about what I care the most. Of course, there were consequences in Academia. Among the most significant not scientific consequences (very likely), yet "not authorized" by me (say, I would not address that problem exactly that way), was rather the extended Me Too movement when it rumbled worldwide in 2017 after celebrities got involved. Alyssa Milano tweeted her post (on 15.10.2017) and then credited Burke for her "Me too" and tweeted a link to her organization (on 16.10.2017) and joined that closely related movement against rapes and sexual harassment in general. On Ukrainian TV (I was lucky to see that) they showed there was like a survey made not clear by whom (as if it appeared out of nowhere and then disappeared... and we could get the final answers on the questions "how?" and "why?") about a wider class of troubles at work in US, not just sexual harassment. That was rather around 0.5-1 year before much more people heard about Weinstein. Before that survey there could also be yet something else. And that something else or the survey very likely could be the consequence of The Great Scientific Revolution. I have the details, of course. The main question here is whether what I said above, a post of Anastasia Melnichenko (weakly known even in Ukraine, her story was very much not correct, what she admitted, she just in fact got into bad circles and got bad luck, and also her story was not related to sexual harassment at work, and what followed was almost not related to that too) or something else led Alyssa Milano to her decision to make that tweet. The last news about "Me Too" looked like it is not successful enough. Maybe because again the prime mover is missing? Yet it looks like rather as drifting, not movement.


So I propose a challenge. I would like to present all the proofs there. Besides that I would like to present a variety of interesting materials. This is not only about punishment, but also about prevention. We have to make sure that such things as the Frankfurt mafia will not exist in the future. You can also get the answers, explanations. It can be done in 2-3 stages. The 1st stage would be with me and journalists, and this better be done ASAP, for which there are several reasons. The 2nd stage would be with possible others who has another opinion. The disadvantage for you to participate there not as journalist can be not only that you can leave as just impostor, with additional disgrace and disrespect, but also with legal consequences. In particular, you would have to answer questions, starting with the basic ones like "How have you been in that system?" or "Why didn't you do that before?". Anyway I would like to present more materials on the 2nd stage and to bring this to another level. There would be the 3rd stage if necessary. It is better we make it this way than other way. I hope to see there representatives of the worldwide known mass media, journalists from at least the each 4 continents. I like journalists. I hope EU will show freedom of speech. EU claims to have it in an exemplary form. It would be pleasure for me to see the representatives of all my favourite mass media. It is better that you take a polygraph with yourself and the expert. I would ask you to give me then the report-expertise. The rendezvous can be discussed, but most likely this will be Kyiv. At least for the 1st stage. Meanwhile I may ask you to cosponsor the event. If you represent a mass media and wish to participate, inform about this somehow, better with an article published by your means and a comment with URL to that page.


Now you know how it started. Maybe you want to know how it is to be finished. I don't need what's not mine, but I am going to get what's mine. So welcome to the challenge and don't miss the event happening once per 1+ millennia.


If you want to know more about me or get more information right now, you can try to do this.


And don't forget to watch for updates here, there and all around just in case.


That is all again in short.


95 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All
Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page